|HOME|OPINIONS|
FORT PECK TRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS
FORT PECK INDIAN RESERVATION
ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES
POPLAR, MONTANA
**********************************
|
John
Todd McClammy and Will James McClammy, vs. |
Appeal No. 259 |
**********************************
OPINION
**********************************
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
William
T. McClamrny executed a will on February 7, 1985 which
contained the following:
"I give, devise and bequeath ail property of every kind and character and wherever located, owned by me or in which I have any interest at the time of my death, to my wife, GENEVIEVE A. McCLAMMY, for and during her natural life, and upon her death, I give, devise and bequeath the same unto my sons, JOHN TODD McCLAMMY and WILL JAMES McCLAMMY, in equal proportions, share and share alike."
The facts in this case indicate that William T. McClamrny deceased on November 8, 1988. His wife was appointed as administrator of his estate and no further probate proceedings were held.
On or about May 1, 1991, Genevieve McClammy entered into a contract with Russell Kirn for the sale of a quonset building that was on land that had been originally leased by William T. McClamrny. The agreed sale price was $3,500 of which $1,900 was paid at the time of the sale. The Appellant John Todd McClamrny, among others was present at the time of the sale and he agreed with the sale.
Genevieve
McClamrny died on August 9, 1991. On September 10, 1991
Russell Kirn paid the balance of $1,600 to Carol Gilham, personal representative
of Genevieve's estate. Carol Gilham in turn
used the money to pay outstanding debts of Genevieve McClamrny and to purchase
headstones for both William and Genevieve
McClamrny. On June 29, 1992 John Todd McClamrny brought action
against Russell Kirn and Carol Gilham requesting the Tribal
Court to void the transaction between Genevieve McClamrny and
Russell Kirn. Judge Robert Welch dismissed the complaint against
Russell Kirn with prejudice on October 29, 1992.
An appeal was filed. On October 13, 1993, it was remanded to the lower court for determination of two issues namely:
- Whether Genevieve McClamrny was seized with the full ownership right to sell the building without the ratification of the plaintiff remaindermen?
- Whether Genevieve McClamrny sold the quonset as personal representative of the estate of William T. McClammy or
sold the quonset for her sole and separate property for
her own benefit?
On April 2, 1996 the honorable Leland Spottedbird issued an order containing the following conclusions:
- That the plaintiff remaindermen were aware of the transaction at the time and had no objection to the sale of the building.
- That Genevieve McClammy sold the quonset building as her sole and separate property to continue her moderate life style.
Judge Spottedbird then dismissed
the complaint against Russell
Kirn. As a result an appeal was filed on July 11, 1996 in
this court.
RULE OF LAW
It
is well cited in the Appellee's brief that " ...the general
principle is that the intention of a testator is to be collected
from the entire will, rather than from any particular clause,
sentence, or form of words." When applying the facts of ;
this case to the prevailing law it is clearly seen that William T.
McClammy "intended" to have all his debts paid and to provide i for
Genevieve McClammy during her lifetime. Additionally
it is noted that the remaindermen here had knowledge
of and did not object to the sale of the quonset.
Considering the fact that the quonset
is not considered real property and
remainder interest does not attach, it is the finding
of this court that Genevieve McClammy had the authority to
sell the quonset to Russell Kirn prior to her death.
Now therefore it is the order of this court that the lower court decision is affirmed in all respects.
Dated
this 30th day of October, 1998.
GARY M. BEAUDRY
Chief Justice